Wednesday, 24 July 2024

People who don't let their cats out...

One of the things I can't get my head around is people who don't let their cat out... a man on Facebook recently said his cat had escaped and he had had to go any rescue it.  It wasn't even missing just two doors down or something and hadn't even been gone a whole day.  He said he lived in a dangerous area with lots of busy traffic so only let them play in in a walled garden.  "They're my babies."  No, they're not mate, they're cats.  They have their own parents.  

These cat captors always remind me of my music teacher Miss* Rainbow's mother Mrs Rainbow's cat Chink.  Miss Rainbow's mother was a cultured intelligent woman capable of very intellectual conversation but unfortunately she was also suffering from mental decline.  If you went out the room and came back in then she'd completely forget she'd ever met you and the conversation would start again as if you were literally meeting for the first time.  Chink, who she never let out and used to take for walks on a bit of string, had learned to exploit these President-Biden-like qualities to get constantly fed as Mrs Rainbow would keep forgetting that she'd fed Chink every time Chink went in and out of the room so Chink would constantly pop in and out of the kitchen to get fed again.  The result was that Chink was the fattest cat you have ever seen - about the size of three normal cats.  Eventually Mrs Rainbow had to have permanent care and was taken into an old people's home.  Miss Rainbow then radically redecorated the house which had had the same decor for about 50 years as Mrs Rainbow was still convinced it was 1950 and Chink went on a rapid diet and gradually reduced in size from three cats size to normal cat size.  Eventually he was even able to get up off the floor and sit on my lap when I was playing the piano and dig his claws in... but it's always left me with the belief that it's just not right to not let cats out...

Then I thought is this reasonable?  Well, Larry the cat lives at 10 Downing Street and he's allowed out on his own.  He's never been run over... Although Larry's coworker Freya (drafted in by Cameron to create a competitive mousing market) was hit by a car and had to see a vet and was retired to the countryside after wandering too far away from home.  Previous to that predecessor Peter II was run over and killed by a car in 1947.  Peter II replaced Peter I who was put down aged 17 because the Attlee government decided he was inefficient.  And he wondered why his majority was slashed to 5 at the next General Election.  Anyway, one cat death per hundred years seems a reasonable pet death risk to take...?  Okay, maybe not...

* Note to feminist historians ....




Ms wasn't in common parlance till the mid-80s so they were Mrs & Miss.  Due to the formality of the age one was not allowed to address teachers by their first name - even music teachers - but Ms Rainbow later told me her name was Marguerite.  I don't know what Mrs Rainbow's first name was but I do remember Marguerite showing me a photograph of her great grandfather who was the butler in the Tichborne fraud / impersonation case trial (see here).  The kind of thing that happened before DNA when people who were greedy would claim to be rich dead relatives of missing persons in an attempt to inherit lots of money.  (See Anastasia.)  There was a film made about it a decade ago... (see here).

 

Wednesday, 17 July 2024

I say I say... is it already dead American Democracy?


Seventy years ago, a farmer beheaded a chicken in Colorado, and it refused to die. Mike, as the bird became known, survived for 18 months.  A similar fate appears to be befalling American Democracy.  American democracy is founded around the separation of political power among a legislature, an executive, and a judiciary.  

With recent events such as the Supreme Court making perverse and unconstitutional decisions (such as that Trump has immunity from prosecution to the level where if the President commits a crime whilst within his official capacity or adjacent to it his motives can't be questioned or his documents used to convict him) and Judge Cannon pulling the plug of the Missing Documents case on the grounds that Jack Smith's position as Special Council is unconstitutional on the advice of a rogue Supreme Court Justice's unasked for opinion it's pretty clear that the Judicial wing of government has been totally corrupted.  It doesn't matter what court finds Donald Trump guilty of felonies, it will be escalated to the Supreme Court who will just let him off ...or concoct another reason why he should not be in prison.  If it gets there at all before or after November when Trump is sworn in again... Although he isn't actually sworn in till January... If he wins in November....

However, the death of the Judicial wing of the government still leaves the Legislature and Executive ticking over in much the same way that after the chicken was beheaded in Colorado there was still enough of its brain stem surviving to allow its legs to keep moving and to keep it running all over the place.  Perpetually in motion but seemingly going nowhere.  Incumbent governments everywhere are having a hard time due to massive inflation and the pandemic so it's likely Biden won't win this year.  Not unless he stays up after his bedtime again and we all saw what happened last time...  

I think it was Theo Kretschmar-Schuldorff who said "We read in the newspapers that the after-pandemic years were bad everywhere, that crime was increasing and that honest citizens were having a hard job to put the gangsters in jail.  Well in the United States, the gangsters finally succeeded in putting the honest citizens in jail."  

For how else can you describe the situation where Donald Trump becomes President, pardons himself and then his lackies...? He then promises to go on a vengeance spree to match a Tarantino movie...?

There may be a miracle like Juan Merchan actually passing sentence on the 18th of September but I doubt it...  He would be a fool not to fear retribution.  The damage is done.

Tuesday, 16 July 2024

Could it be a VP thicker than Dan Quayle

 His mistakes now seem like small potatoes 



Friday, 12 July 2024

Reform are Real People

 

The Reform Party today rebutted accusations that it had fielded any fake "ghost" candidates in the General Election.  

"It is completely false to state that any of our candidates are not real," said their vetting spokesman Mr Timothy Claypole.  

"Although we did not have time for administrative reasons to fully biographically detail all of our candidates on our website and left a great many blank spaces and missing photographs, it is important to state that all our candidates were real people like Hubert Davenport and Fred Mumford and all their candidate papers were signed by well known business persons in their local areas such as Harold and Ethel Meaker and Adam Painting," he added.  "It is true that some candidates were not seen at any hustings but just because they did not live or campaign locally to their constituencies does not mean that they had no connection with those local areas.  For example, although she has not been seen in Scotland since before the Civil War, Hazel McWitch still has a strong affinity with the Glasgow area due to having being burned to death there.  Contrary too to the media depiction of Reform as a party dominated by aging middle aged white gentlemen ("gammons") we also include among our number several ethnic minority women such as Nadia Popov who unfortunately could not canvass during the summer due to suffering from hay fever.  Any rumors to the contrary are completely false and we believe they have been put about by local Conservative activists Rose and Arthur Perkins against whom we shall soon be instituting legal proceedings.  We are consulting our solicitor Whatsisname Smith."

Sunday, 7 July 2024

Moiré patterns ....

 Looking at Rishi's wife's much derided / unusual dress ...









...it reminded me of a question that has haunted me all my life.  In the 80s the late political journalist John Cole was famous for wearing this coat...








...he wore a coat because he was always out in the cold on Westminster Green because in those days lobby journalists were banned from inside the Houses of Parliament.  Should one be caught there an MP could proclaim "I spy stranger!" and throw them out into the cold.  TV was completely verboten.  Cameras weren't even allowed in the chambers till the late 80s.  Anyway...


...this meant John was forever being filmed on Westminster Green in the rain interviewing MPs in this coat.  The problem was with it's zig zag pattern it created all kinds of Moiré patterns on the limited 625 line TV system of the time.





Now if you go on TV (so I've been told by many people including Ava Alexis) they give you a lot of advice on what not to wear.  Even today where Moiré patterns aren't so much of an issue due to increased picture resolution and contrast, they give you a lot of advice about colour and contrast.  So the question is...


Did John really not know this was happening?


Or did he not care?


Or did he have special dispensation?


Or did he wear it precisely because he knew it would make him stand out?


Or was it that as a journalist he thought he was above such things?


Or was the BBC so siloed that the News department just didn't have a costume department full stop?


Or... Or...


Can anyone answer this mystery from history?

Wednesday, 3 July 2024

No man is a traffic island

 

Well, this has been a boring election campaign with the leaders assiduously avoiding any real voters in case they might get heckled and lose it like Gordon Brown.  Just a series of staged photo ops.  Look, Rishi is in a factory again.  Honestly, it's getting to the point where I'm afraid to put on my high viz at work in case Rishi or Keir pops out and makes a speech.  Imagine being forced by your boss to listen that nonsense... Talk about a captive audience.

Say what you like about John Major but he got his soap box out and went about shopping centres ... well, I suppose they're all half empty or closed now so Rishi has to hang out in warehouses, factories and robot distribution centres as that's where the jobs are now... I wonder what the robots think about his STEM obsessions and if he's canvassing them?  Oh well, at least when he calls up all the young men for WWIII National Service we won't have to send the women to work in the factories... Funny how they can make robots to pack one's shopping but not do one's cleaning...

Further from the action I have been somewhat entertained by Johnny Mercer's campaign videos.  He's as doomed as the dodo but it's kind of amusing to watch him pounding the streets with his long suffering wife.  Due to boundary changes a larger than usual number of sitting MPs are doomed to electoral oblivion - including Jeremy Hunt who was on the news last night trying to look chipper.  Theresa May left a message on a videophone.  It would be sweet being left a message by a former Tory Prime Minister if there weren't so many of them... One day everyone will be a Tory Prime Minister for 15 minutes...

My abiding memory of the Brexit campaign was seeing an old man sitting on a Croydon roundabout in the rain displaying a cardboard sign saying "Freedom Now!".  No man is a traffic island ... but some of them stand on them...



Tuesday, 2 July 2024

The Bigly Immunity


Having waited to the last possible moment to release it, the Supreme Court of the United States has just issued it’s bonkers ruling on Donald Trump’s immunity with all the aplomb of a toddler showing its mummy what it has left in its potty. 

The timing could not be more cynical.  At the last minute of their latest judicial term and just before Donald Trump’s sentencing in New York and the Republican Convention.  It was previously a possibility that the Convention would not have been able to confer the nomination in person on Donald because with the sentencing on the 11th and the Convention on the 15th Trump might have been in prison.

However, not content with defining the President’s “Core” Acts as Immune from prosecution and any acts that may also be vaguely related to those as probably Immune as well, the SCROTUM – sorry SCOTUS – has decided to throw a number of legal testicles – sorry, I mean curveballs at the lower courts as well.  In particular prosecutors are now no longer allowed to use “testimony or private records of the President or his advisors” as evidence in criminal proceedings. 

This immediately means that the verdict in Donald Trump’s Hush Money / Election Interference case may be questioned on the grounds that the jury saw evidence that should not have been submitted.  Since, like the Pope when speaking ex cathedra, the position of the Supreme Court is that it never makes a mistake and only reinterprets what has gone before …it’s rulings now should have been applied in the past as in SCOTUS world nothing ever changes, it just wasn’t noticed before.  Except when the SCOTUS actually did “overturn” Roe V Wade as "egregiously wrong from the start" explaining that this was because its reasoning was "exceptionally weak".  In much the same way that the RCC now purports that Limbo never existed and animals do have souls it was just the theology that was misunderstood…

Anyway, the upshot is that Trump’s lawyers were straight off the starting block at challenging the conviction and sentencing has had to be put back… incidentally, if official records can’t be used to prosecute a President because they’re inadmissible in Court does that mean the Watergate tapes couldn’t have been used to prosecute Nixon (if he hadn’t been pardoned)?

Not content with just this legal hand grenade the Supreme Court Justice Clarence Smith issued a “concurring opinion” having a go at the legality of Special Prosecutor Jack Smith’s job – suggesting that “there are serious questions whether the Attorney General violated the structure …” of the constitution by appointing him.  Which wasn’t even a question on which he’d been asked to adjudicate but just happens to be one of the nebulous delaying arguments that Judge Aileen Canon has been cogitating in her attempt to find reasons not to fix a Trial date in the Classified Documents case …If the Office of the Special Council is illegal someone should tell them because they have their own official government website https://www.usa.gov/agencies/office-of-special-counsel#:~:text=The%20Office%20of%20Special%20Counsel,protect%20government%20employees%20and%20whistleblowers.

It all goes to show how closely the MAGA movement has wrapped it's corrupt tentacles around the American institutions placing Trump's flunkies in positions to later help him in his machinations... his plans to be a Dictator were obvious as early as November 2020 ...I said there would be a coup but no one listened until... people don't want to believe the worst of people but if there is a person with no redeeming features it probably is Donald Trump.  A convicted crook, a convicted felon, a serial libeler, a man who boasts of molesting women and according to one court probably an actual rapist...



Some had argued that the SCOTUS wouldn’t find in favour of Presidential Immunity for criminal acts because it would undermine its own power… but Judges on the Court are probably more interested in their position than in power… After all, like all Dictators from day one Trump will still need a Judiciary.  I mean, all those political dissidents aren’t going to try and execute themselves…  If you really want to scare yourself read Project 2025… 


Leaving aside the issue of whether Presidential Criminal Immunity exists and to what degree there is also the question of whether it needs to exist.  UK Prime Ministers have no immunity from prosecution (being only “first among equals”) and the system seems to function fine with Boris being booted out etc… One argument advanced for Presidential Immunity is something along the lines that “If a President was to order his minions assassinate a terrorist leader abroad he shouldn’t be prosecuted for that”.  But such a prosecution would only take place within the jurisdiction where it happened anyway (where there is unlikely to an extradition treaty) and unlike Mr Blair who could have been prosecuted by the ICC if they had a “definition of aggressive war” which was strangely not at hand at the time a prosecution was attempted …the US isn’t even a signatory to the ICC … so how could such a bizarre set of events happen anyway?

Thursday, 27 June 2024

Faites vos jeux

As the Today Program has given up racing tips..here are my "which MP will lose their seat" tips.  Because why should MPs make all the money out of General Election Results?  I've put a tenner each on Grant Shapps, Penny Mourdant & Kwasi's replacement to lose to Labour... after all he gambled with our money so now I'm gambling on them...  I think this is a fairly safe slate of bets ... I was too scared to bet on the Greens even though they're probably going to win Bristol Central...  but other than that...

The spreadsheet below took me so long that by the end I felt like Winston Ingram.  The betting odds are from William Hill - not everyone will still take bets and some candidates they won't let you bet on ... it starts with Liverpool Riverside - the safest seat in the country (bet £10 to win 1p) ...and works its way down to the better bets.... I've drawn the line at Kwasi's seat because I recon to be safe one should factor in a 10->15% electoral shock.  The EC chance column is taken from Electoral Calculus Website ... I've also plundered the wisdom of Sam Coates of Sky News whose wall of digital Tory doom can be found here.



Oh well, it almost worked... think possibly my strategy of spread betting didn't work but I suppose it did ameliorate the losses... the logical path to success would have been to put all the money on someone with lower odds ... but where's the fun in that?  ...that's not how the greed monster works, is it?



Thursday, 20 June 2024

The police shouldn't make sure the house always wins

I fail to understand why it's cheating at gambling to place a bet knowing something the bookmaker doesn't.  If they don't like it that the punters might know more than them they shouldn't take bets on predictable events.  Here's an idea.  If bookmakers lost money because people were able to predict the election better than them, why don't they just suck it up?


The Gambling Commission can whinge all it likes that "snot fair" but the law says ...


(1)A person commits an offence if he—

(a)cheats at gambling, or

(b)does anything for the purpose of enabling or assisting another person to cheat at gambling.


But there's never been any fixed definition of what cheating is.  I don't see any reason why the punter should have to yield their foreknowledge to the Turf Accountant.  It is up to bookmakers to research the likelihood of an event they take a bet against.  If they can't do that they shouldn't take the bet, not blame everyone else for their incompetence.  But in the Topsy Turvey world we live in outwitting the bookmaker is wrong...


All this rubbish talked about insider knowledge.... This is not insider trading.  Insider trading damages businesses because their share prices are what they raise finance against and those finances are used to run productive businesses that create jobs.  Whereas if you outwit a bookie the only loser is the bookie.


From websites to TV shows to Fixed Odds Betting Terminals to employing PHD level mathematicians gambling companies use every trick in the book to try to separate the punters from their money.  Why when they lose should police time be wasted investigating their customers because the bookies lost their own bets?  Not a microsecond should be wasted on this.

Monday, 17 June 2024

Sorry Jason Cummings I cannot vote for you...

...for you are the candidate for Croydon East.  And I live in Croydon South.  Sorry no one told you that the boundaries had changed.

Anklebiters

I think Prince Louis is going to pass the age soon where his antics stop being considered cute.  I wonder what happened that he isn't a Stepford child like the other two...
 

Friday, 14 June 2024

Private Likes on X

Twitter continues it's decent into becoming the poor man's Onlyfans with a new policy of keeping likes private between the liker & the liked.  That a tweet has been liked by someone remains visible to all... So what is the purpose of this?  It bewildered me.  With likes private how will, for example, the National Executive Committee know who to throw out the Labour Party for having a verboten opinion?

The answer is it is part of X-man's attempt to turn twitter into a more X rated platform.  Every day my comments are liked by dumb prossie bots - I refuse to call them sex workers because I doubt that any of them are actual real people.  It's annoying because if you test a joke on there and people like it you then have to curate those likes to check which are from cyberwhores.  The fact of being visibly publicly solicited by autoslappers in this way is clearly embarrassing for anyone in a relationship so Musk has made it private to conceal that it's seedy and inappropriate.  Well, I suppose it shows him to have a slither of emotional intelligence.  The kind Arthur Daley once showed when he told the Receptionist at a massage parlour he co-owned to make the service they offered sound "less like Transportation from Newgate Assizes".


Call me Mary Whitehouse but this and the never ending splurge of robomuffpedlars is not an accident, it's all part of X's plan to hoist more porn on everyone.  The Ts and Cs have been officially updated to allow cyber ladybots of the night...


"Sexual expression, whether visual or written, can be a legitimate form of artistic expression," the platform's policy states. "We believe in the autonomy of adults to engage with and create content that reflects their own beliefs, desires, and experiences, including those related to sexuality."


Apparently the platform will still prohibit pornographic content that is exploitative, nonconsensual or promotes objectification, obscene behaviors or the sexualization or harm to minors.  


A deceased school friend of mine in the 80s had a PC that connected to the pre-internet ... All he seemed to manage to download was some black and white still images of porn.  Perhaps this is the internet returning to it's roots...

Is there such a thing as non-objectifying porn ... That sounds like you're just doing it wrong?


Musk craves respectability but scratch beneath the veneer and he's just a pimp.

Thursday, 13 June 2024

Fearmonger

 

Apparently Mr Toad ran a 4 minute Party Political Broadcast that was just this title card and no sound. No policies, no detail, no plan beyond blatant fear mongering it seems somehow extremely apt.  In the end all far right parties feed on fear but this is particularly naked and blatant.  Funny I thought the whole point of the Brexit that Mr Toad sold us was that it was going to fix everything but here he is again with... Well, at least Brexit was a policy ... Now UKIP/Reform/Whatever seems to have nothing to offer but an existential void.


Still, I suppose we were saved more of Mr Toad's lies.  At the moment he's trying to insist that we are the odd man out in Europe (the one we Brexited from to be different) in having a Universal Healthcare system instead of an insurance based system.  However, France effectively in practice turned their insurance system into a Universal Healthcare system in the 2000s under Lionel Jospin.  The direction of travel is actually away from insurance based systems but Mr Toad carries on unencumbered by reality ... until, of course, someone throws a physical missile at him.


In other news I accidentally suffered Britain's Most Spiteful Headmistress wheeled out on Newsnight to attack Labour's policy of free un-means-tested breakfasts in schools...


Margaret Thatcher milk snatcher

Katharine Birbalsingh breakfast segregating

Tuesday, 11 June 2024

It's wrong to bully Mr Toad

Mr Toad has my unequivocal support.  I would never throw anything at him just because he's a dreadful fascist who deserves it.




















Top tip: Nigel Farage. Deter people from attacking you in public by getting own security who will be recognisable as such because of their own special uniform perhaps incorporating a brown shirt?

Don't mention the government

Somewhat peculiar strategy from Mr Philp in his latest epistle.  He appears to be saying we should note for him because he is better at getting things done than anyone from any other party


....which is akin to I know I'm a Tory but vote for me anyway.


Virtually no mention of policies or the leader...


Weird





Monday, 10 June 2024

People in the military are in fact kindhearted gentle people with no enemies

Surely you can't join the army and claim not to have any enemies?





A fine example of the well intentioned talking twaddle... the function on the military according to our soon to be ex Defence Secretary is to "kill the King's enemies" ...

Strange twitter feed this one with images that range from the moving to the plain bizzare... Like is this meant to be cute?



 










In other news Mr Sunak has promised to make up for leaving the 80th D Day commemorations early by promising to stay longer at the 90th anniversary. Unfortunately it might be a somewhat shorter event due to a lack of participants... 

If we're going to do this National Service thing I don't see why they're just hiring young people.  I suggested to my brother that despite being over 50 since his hobby is running he'd be a far better recruit.  Unfortunately this suggestion went down like a cup of cold sick...

Friday, 7 June 2024

Heroes

Biden had asthma

Trump a bone spur 

So avoided being drafted 

And that's why they're still here


Tuesday, 4 June 2024

Mr Toad is now unfortunately too busy to help Mr Orange

Mr Toad had told us that he'd be too busy campaigning in the US for Mr Orange to have time to participate in the election.  Yet now it seems he is back this side of the pond enjoying refreshing milkshakes.  I wonder what could have caused Mr Orange to be abandoned by his fairweather friend.  Mr Toad has now appointed himself leader of Reform ( there unfortunately wasn't time to ballot all the stoats and weasels ).... as Gavin the Hamster observes those of his friends like Sewerella the slug and Liz the lettuce who feted Mr Toad at his trip to the Conservative conference must feel proper fools now he's turned on them.  So plods on the General Election...


The gentler sex

It always makes me laugh when people cite the Suffragettes as an example of non-violent direct action. They literally invented the letter bo...

Least ignored nonsense this month...