Well, IT has finally happened. Boris Johnson
has prorogued parliament in an
attempt to stop it passing legislation to prevent a no-deal Brexit… but beyond
the hullabaloo about whether or not this is constitutional I’ve started to wonder
if it really matters…
That’s not to say that the constitutional implications of
Johnson’s decision to ask the Queen to scupper the parliamentary timetable aren’t
important … but people seem to forget that it’s not just what Boris or
Parliament wants that matters… but what the EU wants.
Article 50 was triggered by a vote in parliament that said
this should happen by the 30th of March 2017. Theresa May wrote to the EU triggering
article 50 on the 29th of March 2017. This set the two year clock ticking on
Brexit negotiations.
However, by 20th of March 2019 it was clear that
Parliament couldn’t agree to back Mrs May’s deal so an extension was
sought. The European Council agreed to
a postponement until the 22nd of May.
Again Parliament, the Government and the European Council couldn’t
agree so the deadline was postponed again to the 10th of April. This
agreement required Mrs May to again grovel to the divided European Council in the most humiliating fashion ...
...but after Mrs May had chewed her way through a huge helping of humble pie Brexit was indeed delayed at the mercy of the EU leaders until 31st October 2019. I expect by now however, their quality of mercy is becoming strained...
...but after Mrs May had chewed her way through a huge helping of humble pie Brexit was indeed delayed at the mercy of the EU leaders until 31st October 2019. I expect by now however, their quality of mercy is becoming strained...
Now it could be that Parliament could force the Government
to agree to a further extension by finding a way to pass more legislation to
thwart Boris Johnson’s plans … but they can’t force the Prime Minister to
negotiate a new deal with European Council and – although they say they want to
avoid the UK crashing out the EU – it is by no means certain that the European Council
will grant a further extension even if Parliament or the Prime Minister asks
for it.
At this point the European Council could well throw in the towel, say they don’t care and let a no-deal Brexit happen anyway. Everyone seems to be forgetting that there are in fact two parties in the negotiations – the UK and the EU and either can walk away…
At this point the European Council could well throw in the towel, say they don’t care and let a no-deal Brexit happen anyway. Everyone seems to be forgetting that there are in fact two parties in the negotiations – the UK and the EU and either can walk away…
Of course one could ask why Parliament voted for a potential no
deal Brexit in the first place …? presumably because they thought that Mrs May
would be in a better negotiating position but … that didn’t seem to work, did
it?
All the omens are that the European Council will let the country crash out on the 31st of October.
All the omens are that the European Council will let the country crash out on the 31st of October.
At least that’s the case if legislation alone is used to
solve the problem. In my opinion there
is no solution that’s workable to extend the deadline yet again that doesn’t
involve removing Boris and replacing him with a caretaker administration. Clearly there is no point in being Prime
Minister if you can’t get your legislation through parliament and thus an election
is very imminent. But it is in my view a
long shot that the European Council will grant another extension and sit back
while the UK has yet another indecisive General Election. They may well decide that the uncertainty has
gone on too long, there’s nothing in it for them and make the decision for us
by refusing to negotiate with either Boris, Jeremy, Ken or any other Prime
Minister…
…and maybe that would be for the best. Or maybe not... We assume that if the Prime Minister asks the
European Council for another extension then it will just give them one to avoid
looking mean spirited in public. But
what if they don’t…? The Council is made up of the leaders of all the EU countries and they have to answer to their domestic populations who may well think ...nah! After all they too
don’t have to do anything to avoid a no deal Brexit – it’s the default
position.
As to how unconstitutional it all actually is… One remembers
people saying Margaret Thatcher’s use of guillotine motions was
unconstitutional. They weren’t – they were
just disrespectful and cynical - but
soon New Labour took up the same tactics.
Boris isn’t breaking any rules … he’s just bending them like a clown
making balloon animals for a children’s party…
No comments:
Post a Comment