Some time ago (longer than I care remember) I put in an FOI (see here) to Lambeth Council asking them some basic questions about how they handle repairs in Leasehold housing. The Council said it couldn't answer the questions because it was an invasion of privacy for the other leaseholders. So I pointed out that not all the questions I asked were person or property specific.
I also made the point that if the Council can't answer questions about its properties because people live in them then that means it can't answer any housing questions whatsoever as almost all Council properties have someone living in them.
The case then escalated to the Information Commissioner's Office who then reverted back to the Council's original line of argument that it couldn't answer any questions at all because people lived in the property and I repeated my argument that not all the questions were property or person specific. After I had told them that the problem wouldn't go away simply by them repeating the same information back to me over and over as if I had learning difficulties...
The ICO then argued that the release of information under FOI constituted publication to "the whole world" to which I responded that I did not necessarily intend to publish it and even if I did I doubt that anybody would be interested. I also made the point that just because you publish something on the world wide web does not mean anyone will read it. First they would have to google it and secondly the website in question would have to have a large enough search engine ranking to show up. I believe this website sometimes gets as many as 30 hits an article - who can cope with that much public exposure?
I further made the point that once the Council releases information under FOI it no longer has responsibility for its dissemination under FOI and this is the whole point of FOI. By this point I had completely forgotten why I had put in an FOI and my need for the information had now long passed but who cares? We got there in the end.
Well, almost there. 4 out of 6 questions answered isn't bad - particularly since the lady who answers them is based in conveniently Winchester - a mere 64 miles from Lambeth. Apparently the Council doesn't understand the last two questions so can't answer them...? I haven't the patience to reply...
That said it's interesting at least the answer to the first question. Perhaps this explains why the Council like to leave scaffolding up for so long even if there is no work being done ... if the leaseholders are paying for it by the day. Mind you even that question is only partially answered as it doesn't break down the who the costs go to but ... who cares now?
Dear Mr Miller
With regards to your request for information, we are able to provide the following further response:
“Is scaffolding a free Council service? If not how much does it cost the leaseholders and the Council?
No. The cost for scaffolding is calculated according to the length of time advised by the contractors to complete the works to the property / building.
Does the Council have any sanctions for continual lease violations?
We do not have sanctions as such but will take enforcement action where necessary for any breaches of lease such as non-payment of services charges.
Why does the Council not inform leaseholders before putting up scaffolding?
Our normal practice is to inform all residents in the building.
Why do Council subcontractors not give written notice of visits as they are supposed to under schedule 4 section 2 (with 3 days’ notice)?
The normal practice is to give written notice of all visits.
Is it the Council's policy to sell the Freehold of a duel dwelling property without the consent of both parties?
No. The councils website has information on this https://www.lambeth.gov.uk/council-tenants-and-homeowners/homeowners/buying-the-freehold-guide
Is it true that the Council is exempt from right to buy laws with regards to the freehold?
We are unclear exactly what is being asked here; please can you clarify this part of the request?
Is it the Council's policy to sell the freehold of such properties?”
We are unclear exactly what is being asked here; please can you clarify this part of the request?
We hope this is helpful; please clarify the last two questions and we will provide a further response
Kind regards
Jane Shields LLB LLM
Policy & Communications Manager
(FOI Co-ordinator)
Corporate Complaints Unit
P.O. Box 734
Winchester
S023 5DG
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Starmer Unpopular - It's the Economy Stupid
I've recently heard various theories for why Keir Starmer is the "worst Prime Minister in living memory". Is it his purging o...
Least ignored nonsense this month...
-
Lawmakers should not be Flyposters Today I am most amused by Kemi sacking Robert Jenrick. I tried to grass his for fly posting ages ago but...
-
From its grand construction to its tragic end, this immersive journey brings the legend to life with stunning high-tech visuals, artefacts a...
-
Yesterday I was unfriended by someone on Facebook. I questioned the narrative generally wheeled on in articles such as this that all the B...
-
Amazon MGM Studios' film NADEZHDA offers unprecedented access to the 20 days leading up to the 13th Party Congress in May 1924 -- throug...
-
The latest money man that social media forces on me is Mark Tilbury who boasts loudly of being a millionaire. Mate, nearly everyone down ...
-
And what kind of advert is this? Do they really think that refereeing a punch up inside a prison is something to aspire to? Does anyone lo...
-
If anyone's still in doubt about the ramifications of the Andy Burnham situation let me spell it out for you. There are 400 Labour MPs...
-
Another day another bonkers conspiracy theory circulating the far right on X. Today it's Abiogenic petroleum. This is the theory tha...
-
So claims Sir Keir Starmer but one didn’t have to call in Mycroft Holmes to find the facts about Epstein and Mandelson even then. Back in 20...
-
Dear Sir, I write most strongly to protest at the government's plans to re-enlist ex-soldiers up to the age of 65 back into the army sho...
No comments:
Post a Comment