One of the things people often say about British people as a
snide comment is that we’re “very good at divide and conquer”. A dig at the old days of the Empire. Well, looking at Parliament today locked in
its endless squabbles over Brexit one has to say the current batch of elected
potenates are no Philip II of Macedon.
The cat that is the true costs and complexity of Brexit having escaped
the bag Boris and Co concealed it in before the Referendum those at the top are
caught between the devil and the deep blue sea every way they don’t jump. Ms May flits about Europe negotiating with
every country independently because we’re in too big a sulk to have anything to
do with the European Parliament and then says only she has the magical power of
forceful negotiation. Corbyn and Co say
that only they have the magic answer.
The Unionists are in a terrible rage that they’ve been sold down the
river. Without getting in to the
mechanics of the backstop it was surely obvious to the meanest intelligence that
if Europe and the UK
separated politically then that would have serious implications for the Good
Friday Agreement. The SNP just say
endlessly that they want to leave us for the EU. And I’m sure the Liberal Democrats would be
doing something stupid too if there were enough for anyone to listen to
them. Faced with the gravest political
crisis in decades the complete inability of any of the main or even minor
parties to work together on a solution is truly depressing. Everyone is simply out to make as much cheap
short term capital as possible.
Threatening general elections, leadership elections, 2nd referendums
(and possibly 3rd or 4th) … Brexit rolls on endlessly to
the cliff edge of dropping out on WTO rules with the unstoppable momentum that
can only come from a plebiscite cutting the brakes. The pound has already thrown its self over
the edge of the cliff like a Lemming. And
finally Ms May has pulled the vote she knows she would’ve lost. Well, Turkeys
don’t vote for Christmas and this Christmas no one wanted to vote for the “deal”
that was a Turkey. How the EU officials must laugh and laugh and laugh at the childish Brexit blame game. What these politicians don't realise is if they mess this up history will never forgive them. Not that that matters if you have no shame.
Tuesday, 11 December 2018
Mentoring...?
Me? Mentor other comics? What in? How not to make money? or How to
Promote badly? Sorry but I don't think comedy needs any more
incompetent people giving other incompetent people free advice.
Monday, 10 December 2018
Mark Zuckerberg bans me posting links to my own blog as "Spam"
Gentle Readers, Mark Elliot Zuckerberg has decided in his wisdom that I
cannot put any more links in Facebook to external content such as my
novels or this blog as apparently posting links to your own product on
Facebook is "spam" and "against community standards". I have thus
decided to give Mark even less content than I used to. I dont mind
giving content away for free but I dont see why I should give it to him
personally so @Zhu_Zhanji will now be hanging out down twitter for the
forseeable where it is all spam and there's no such policy.
Funny one thinks no one reads this blog but it's good to learn that it's a commercial threat to someone's business model somewhere...
I read recently he was empty chaired by some politicians who claimed to represent 400,000,000 plebs (a slight lie) and couldn't get in touch with him. Just put a link to any external content on his site old beans and you'll hear from the Z almost straight away. Sorry, Mark, why should I give you money to "spam" people when Twitter will let me spam 'em for free?
Funny one thinks no one reads this blog but it's good to learn that it's a commercial threat to someone's business model somewhere...
I read recently he was empty chaired by some politicians who claimed to represent 400,000,000 plebs (a slight lie) and couldn't get in touch with him. Just put a link to any external content on his site old beans and you'll hear from the Z almost straight away. Sorry, Mark, why should I give you money to "spam" people when Twitter will let me spam 'em for free?
Saturday, 8 December 2018
Council/Goverment uses the Data Protection 2018 Act to avoid answering any questions at all about Housing
Council/Goverment uses the Data Protection 2018 Act to avoid answering any questions at all about Housing
Remember Houses contain people so all questions about housing can be refused on the basis they are an invasion of privacy. Even if you ask a generic question about a set of houses.
Dear Mr Miller
I write further to my letter of 7 September 2018 regarding this matter.
I have carefully considered your request for information contained in the letter you received from the London borough of Lambeth (the Council) dated 24 August 2018 (attached).
I am satisfied that the Council was entitled to deny your request on the basis of the exemption at section 40(5) of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (FOIA) largely for the reasons explained to you by the Council in that letter of 24 August and upheld by the Council following an internal review (attached).
Technically, given that the request relates to possible construction or repair work on a property, it is likely that it should have been handled under the Environmental Information Regulations 2004 (EIR) and not the FOIA.
However, this would not have made any material difference to the outcome because there is an equivalent exception (to section 40(5) of the FOIA) in regulation 13(5) of the EIR.
The information requested relates to an identifiable living individual(s). Confirming or denying whether the requested information is held inevitably reveals something about (properties enquired about) which is clearly linked to the occupants of either property.
Such information defined as personal data in the Data Protection Act 2018 (DPA) is exempt under the FOIA or the EIR. Information released under the FOIA or the EIR is effectively released to the world at large regardless of whether only one individual has requested the information.
In the circumstances of this case, I cannot see that there is a lawful basis for confirming or denying to the whole world whether the information requested in relation to the two properties in question is held. Clearly, there may be legitimate reasons for releasing this information to you or to others. However, that is not the same as releasing it to everyone else.
The Commissioner's position in relation to such requests for information is now established. You can find published decisions in relation to section 40(5) and regulation 13(5) on our website here: https://icosearch.ico.org.uk/s/search.html?collection=ico-meta&profile=decisions&query
You say that you re-submitted your requests in a generic form not relating to the properties and that these were also denied by the Council.
However, this complaint is about the response from the Council to your request which according to the Council was received in June 2018. If you wish to complain about the fresh request you submitted, you may do so through the following page on our website: https://ico.org.uk/make-a-complaint/
What happens next?
You may request a decision notice if you would like to appeal my decision to the First-Tier Information Rights Tribunal. Please note that it may take up to 2-3 months before I can issue the decision notice which will not differ materially from the explanation above.
Please contact me by Friday 14 December 2018 if you have any questions and/or would like to appeal my decision.
I shall assume you have withdrawn your complaint and close the case if I have not heard from you by 14 December.
Yours Sincerely
Terna Waya
Senior Case Officer
03304146366
Remember Houses contain people so all questions about housing can be refused on the basis they are an invasion of privacy. Even if you ask a generic question about a set of houses.
Dear Mr Miller
I write further to my letter of 7 September 2018 regarding this matter.
I have carefully considered your request for information contained in the letter you received from the London borough of Lambeth (the Council) dated 24 August 2018 (attached).
I am satisfied that the Council was entitled to deny your request on the basis of the exemption at section 40(5) of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (FOIA) largely for the reasons explained to you by the Council in that letter of 24 August and upheld by the Council following an internal review (attached).
Technically, given that the request relates to possible construction or repair work on a property, it is likely that it should have been handled under the Environmental Information Regulations 2004 (EIR) and not the FOIA.
However, this would not have made any material difference to the outcome because there is an equivalent exception (to section 40(5) of the FOIA) in regulation 13(5) of the EIR.
The information requested relates to an identifiable living individual(s). Confirming or denying whether the requested information is held inevitably reveals something about (properties enquired about) which is clearly linked to the occupants of either property.
Such information defined as personal data in the Data Protection Act 2018 (DPA) is exempt under the FOIA or the EIR. Information released under the FOIA or the EIR is effectively released to the world at large regardless of whether only one individual has requested the information.
In the circumstances of this case, I cannot see that there is a lawful basis for confirming or denying to the whole world whether the information requested in relation to the two properties in question is held. Clearly, there may be legitimate reasons for releasing this information to you or to others. However, that is not the same as releasing it to everyone else.
The Commissioner's position in relation to such requests for information is now established. You can find published decisions in relation to section 40(5) and regulation 13(5) on our website here: https://icosearch.ico.org.uk/s/search.html?collection=ico-meta&profile=decisions&query
You say that you re-submitted your requests in a generic form not relating to the properties and that these were also denied by the Council.
However, this complaint is about the response from the Council to your request which according to the Council was received in June 2018. If you wish to complain about the fresh request you submitted, you may do so through the following page on our website: https://ico.org.uk/make-a-complaint/
What happens next?
You may request a decision notice if you would like to appeal my decision to the First-Tier Information Rights Tribunal. Please note that it may take up to 2-3 months before I can issue the decision notice which will not differ materially from the explanation above.
Please contact me by Friday 14 December 2018 if you have any questions and/or would like to appeal my decision.
I shall assume you have withdrawn your complaint and close the case if I have not heard from you by 14 December.
Yours Sincerely
Terna Waya
Senior Case Officer
03304146366
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
Not Only ... But Also... MI5
Yesterday I was unfriended by Tony Hadoke on Facebook. I questioned his narrative in an article he was quoted in for the Guardian or somet...
Least ignored nonsense this month...
-
The Seeds of Rhinoplasty Due to them wearing out and my VHS player being increasingly hard to service (it's a beautiful piece of enginee...
-
Yesterday I was unfriended by Tony Hadoke on Facebook. I questioned his narrative in an article he was quoted in for the Guardian or somet...
-
(guest post by J R Ewing) I have to admit to a dislike for the School Strike for Climate Change movement. Firstly because it’s no...
-
And so with Michael Cohen the prosecution's case will close by a lot. It appears that Trump told Cohen that if his wife found out abo...
-
I have to admit I find Facebook’s block button it’s most magical feature allowing one to banish from one’s life people who one would ...
-
Magna Carter : "NO Freeman shall be taken or imprisoned, or be disseised of his Freehold, or Liberties, or free Customs, or be outlawed...
-
Once upon a time Up the Creek used to have a Sunday night gig with the open spots sandwiched in the middle. There would be an opening 20 ...
-
X/Twitter continues it's descent into the sewer as my timeline now appears full of Russian proxies wittering on about "Europe pok...
-
Well, I’ve finally managed to watch Star Trek Picard which although it only consists of 30 episodes feels like something of a feat. I start...


