Monday, 10 May 2021

So that's why he has a long overcoat...

 


The Noel Clarke allegations rumble on… along with allegations that he told an entire class at the London School of Dramatic Art to get their kit off during “improvisation worktops” …older allegations have resurfaced about John Barrowman repeatedly exposing himself on the sets Doctor Who and Torchwood …. Which Barrowman puts down to too much “exuberance” although one suspects some kind of paraphilia.  Oh well, there are worse paraphilias … at least one understands now why Captain Jack always wears that large overcoat.  I have to say I have occasionally wondered if Captain Jack’s very tactile character would raise more questions today…

There’s something quite disturbing in the film that’s resurfaced about Noel telling the audience about John putting his penis on Camille Coduri's shoulder and her saying she was “trying to be polite” by not mentioning it.  Blurring fact and fiction one imagines Dot Clapton  in Rumpole of the Bailey dealing with the situation less diplomatically... Noel reveals that Christopher Eccleston for one was not amused …Oh, well it’s not like he left in mysterious circumstances that to this day have never been fully explained…

Strangely then I found myself wondering about all kinds of other incidents involving nakedness… like Malcolm Hardee getting his penis out frequently at Up The Creek … or the strange fad in the 1970s for streakers at sporting events.  One can possibly explain this as something to do with Test Match Special being so boring that people needed to do this as relief against two old blokes talking constantly about cake and the number 69 bus…. Then I remembered Phil Nichol's The Naked Racist show and how it led to a fad of open spots trying to strip at Pear Shaped which lasted about a fortnight.   Then I thought of Lewis CK…

Then I thought of a recent documentary on the making of "One Flew Over the Cookoo's Nest" that I watched the other day (Ava Alexis couldn't believe I'd never seen the film before so bought it for me) in which  Louise Fletcher who played Nurse Mildred Ratched explained she became so jealous of the other actors who were allowed to "play mad" (to the extent of actually living in the mental institution where it was filmed) while she had to be cold and rigid and logical and asexual that one day she took off all her clothes on set as a "release" or something...  Who knows what really motivates people?  Well, probably psychologists.  Danny DeVito said in the same documentary that he became distrurbed he'd got so into the part that he'd invented imaginary friends to talk to.  He spoke to one of the doctors about this and they said "Well, as long as you know it's not real you're okay.  It's just pretend.  Children do it all the time".

Anyway, this stream of consciousness is leading nowhere in particular but I found it interesting that the convention interview where Noel talks about John’s Johnson is quite old … and I wondered if Dr Who fans live in their own bubble that the media isn’t interested in or if fans just turn a blind eye to anything disturbing.  Or if it’s only surfaced now due to a change in society or all three…

I remember suggesting to Toby Hadoke a while ago that perhaps the reason Patrick Troughton didn’t give interviews was less to do with wanting to protect the secrets of his craft and more to do with not wanting the fact he had two families exposed.  A situation he explained to his son as “Things have to change all the time for me I’m afraid, that’s the way I am made.”  Toby took a dim view of such cynicism.  But I wonder…

Sometimes I wonder if I’m really reading the News at all on the internet or it’s just some strange farce dreamed up by the Boulting Brothers or something…

Monday, 26 April 2021

London Mayoral Election 2021 - Is this the best democracy can do?


Sadiq Khan , Labour - who introducted the £15 7-day-a-week congestion charge till 10pm and now can magically undo it now he's being elected

Shaun Bailey, Tory - a dangerous nut job who wants to force companies to drug test their employees and make test league tables of illegal drug use.
Well, if there are too many people to prosecute a Superleague of Cocaine users is going to be as logical as the new Football Superleague...

They've really pushed the boat out to find someone scarey

Siân Berry - Greens who wants to gold plate the green belt - if you gold plate green you probably get a colour like urine?
She at least does have some sensible policies like road pricing instead of the Congestion Charge and LTNs...

Luisa Porritt - Lib Dem who at least isn't going on about proportional representation because this is a PR election

Mandu Reid - the Women's Equality Party candidate who is so modest she doesn't put her own name on her poster

Laurence Fox - right wing nut job who worries about police dancing with protesters

Count Binface - Jon Harvey with a bin on his head

Piers Corbyn - a gestalt creature created by splicing the DNA of Piers Morgan and Jeremy Corbyn

Valerie Brown - standing on the very sensible policy of abolishing the Mayor of London.  
XR candidate so wants a citizens' assemblies (there is one it's called the London Assembly why not stand for that?)
Will probably be in prison by the time she's elected

Kam Balayev - Campaigning for Universal Basic Income despite the fact this is completely outside the Mayor's responsibilities

Max Fosh - Youtuber

Richard Hewison, Rejoin EU - shutting the stable door after the horse has bolted party

Vanessa Hudson, animal party candiate wants "vertical farms"

Steve Kelleher, SDP - this seems to be the new hangout for Brexiteers ...
Shirley Williams is turning in her grave even before she has been laid to rest...

David Kurten - right wing idiot who wants to get rid of "buffer zones outside abortion clinics"

Farah London - a real person or a pun?

Niko Omilana - Yet another youtuber

Nims Obunge - some religious bloke against knife crime

Brian Rose - podcaster who doesn't believe in Covid

I must just put a stamp on the envelope...

 

The worst of it is the Mayor has no power anyway to implent virtually any of these completely mad plans...

Saturday, 24 April 2021

In which Mr Toad attempts to overtake my Vauxhall Corsa with limited success...

 

The other night I was driving home when I heard behind me a beeping of horns and a flashing of lights so intense it could only have come from one of two sources – the police or Mr Toad.  The lights not being blue I presumed that it was Mr Toad from "Wind in the Willows".  

I was correct in this assumption.

As I reached the top of the hill it seemed Mr Toad was directly behind me.  I knew this for a certainty because he kept tooting and flashing even though I was stationary at traffic lights.  When the lights went green I proceeded across the cross roads and he tried to pass me.  There was however no room to pass me so I positioned myself so as to make this even more difficult and started to drive more slowly

  When aggressive drivers toot and flash me it is one of my hobbies to drive overly carefully like an old age pensioner.  Indeed, should I ever be able to afford a flashing sports car it would be my intention to drive my Aston Martin DB5 deliberately slowly – at the exact speed limit and no higher – everywhere just to annoy such drivers.

Having traversed the crossroads and some bends in the road where it would be impossible to pass anyone the trickle of traffic jammed bumper to bumper cars finally reached a stretch of straight road where he attempted to overtake me.  However, I was keeping a two second gap from the car in front so this was impossible to achieve without cutting in.  So he cut in.  So I dropped back in order to stop from driving up the back of him.  He seemed to have succeeded in the manoeuvre when he suddenly pulled out to the right hand lane again and stopped.  I had also stopped to avoid collision.  But why had he stopped?

He got out his car and walked over to my window in the delusion that I was going to wind it down and exchange pleasantries with him but I have long ago tired of collecting pieces of people’s minds that are empty so I let him get right up to the car window and, gauging that I had enough space to get around his stationary motor on the inside, pulled off again.  The cars behind followed me and this put three cars between his and mine.

He followed me through two sets of traffic lights – I stuck to the main road – and at the third got out, came up to the window again and accused me of driving into the back of him.  However, no sooner had he got these words out his mouth than the lights had turned green again and … now I had put even more cars between myself and him.  He lost me.  Brainpower beats horsepower.

Driving back the other way another day it occurred to me that the straight section of road was punctuated by traffic islands and what might have happened is that he had decided to abort his overtake last minute for fear of hitting one of these traffic islands.

Anyway, cogitating on whether I had done the right thing I found myself over at the “Honest John” website – a spin off of the Daily Telegraph – from whence it might seem that some of these thought patterns originate  

 

This afternoon I was driving along a straight road with a national speed limit, behind 3 or 4 cars doing about 35mph. There was a large gap ahead, so I decided to overtake the rear car, as I was nearly past the car (about 2/3 of my car was in front) I noticed that the cars in front were accelerating, and so was the car behind. I carried on, and gradually realised that I could not pull in as he was preventing me, and that I was soon approaching a blind bend and it was about to get extremely dangerous. I slowed, and pulled in behind him. On that day luck was on my side, as just before I pulled back in I was on the wrong side of the road, and dangerously close to a blind bend. IMO someone could have been killed.

 

The main problem for me was that his behaviour was totally unexpected. I wasted seconds trying in vein to clear his car, and then more seconds gradually realising that he was basically racing me, and that I was in considerable danger

A few miles down the road, the traffic had come to a stop. I got out, approached his car, his window was partly down, and I said "could I have a word with you". He wound the window down further. I said "Did you see me overtaking you?" He said "Yes". I said "Did you try to prevent me pulling back in". He said "Yes". I said "By preventing me pulling in, you endangered me and other road users". He said "I don't care you shouldn't have overtaken me". I then said "You are a complete halfwit" a couple of times, except the word was not exactly halfwit, and walked away. I don't really understand the mentality. He was young, and a risk taker judging by the driving I witnessed a few miles later on.

Has anyone else experienced this?

Genuine Responses:

It's a British thing, we like to wait in line but a road isn't a queue at the post office and overtaking isn't queue jumping.

**

As it happens I had a similar experience myself the other day. There were 3 cars behind a slow moving van. Having waited a short while to make sure none of them were intending on overtaking I indicated and moved out. As I was about to come alongside a Polo which was the 2nd car in the queue it pulled out with no indication. Luckily I generally drive expecting people to do daft things, and had already observed his body language and expected it. It meant that I had to slow down though, and meant that I now couldn't be sure of overtaking the remaining vehicles in the space I could see to be clear, so I looked to turn back into the line of traffic, to find that the car I had just overtaken was accelerating as hard as he could to try to block me on the wrong side of the road.

Truly homicidal behaviour. Luckily he was driving a Citroen Saxo while I was driving an Alfa GTA, so a small amount of pressure on the accelerator and I was able to move in with no danger.

I didn't even bother registering my feelings on his behaviour, there's no helping some people.

**

It seems to be automatic behaviour from some people,to prevent others from overtaking. It is dangerous, rude and unnecessary. If someone wants to overtake, why not let them, why not help them, let them get on with it, why would you want to hold them up.

Maybe it's their own lack of confidence and/or lack of ability coming out, which manifests itself as jealousy and spitefulness. Can't think of any other reason.

**

I simply love it when people on here get so morally high-handed about situations where they can visualise the situation however they wish. The OP was trying to overtake. Now, it doesn't matter if he was doing it with his eyes shut on a blind bend, the Highway code is unequivocal:

"144: Being overtaken. If a driver is trying to overtake you, maintain a steady course and speed, slowing down if necessary to let the vehicle pass. Never obstruct drivers who wish to pass. Speeding up or driving unpredictably while someone is overtaking you is dangerous. Drop back to maintain a two-second gap if someone overtakes and pulls into the gap in front of you."

 

Note that it doesn't tell you to judge the manoeuvre in any way or to decide whether the driver is safe.

Before you all rant away at what the OP was doing wrong, why not deal with the discrepancy between the Highway code and the overtakees behaviour?

Fantastic cherry picking given that it also says that

162

Before overtaking you should make sure

    the road is sufficiently clear ahead

    road users are not beginning to overtake you

    there is a suitable gap in front of the road user you plan to overtake.

163

Overtake only when it is safe and legal to do so. You should …

    not get too close to the vehicle you intend to overtake

    move quickly past the vehicle you are overtaking, once you have started to overtake. Allow plenty of room. Move back to the left as soon as you can but do not cut in



    take extra care at night and in poor visibility when it is harder to judge speed and distance

    stay in your lane if traffic is moving slowly in queues. If the queue on your right is moving more slowly than you are, you may pass on the left

The dimwits continue…

It seems to me that Leif did it all by the book. I can't understand the criticism. Well, a lot of the criticism at first was due to the fact people misread the thread and got it in their heads that there was some kind of conspiracy as multiple cars conspired to block him. This is not what he said happened.

The last time I read Roadcraft, I seem to remember it recommending to overtake multiple cars if possible, OR to "work your way up" by overtaking one at a time and slotting in to a gap in front, which is what Leif tried to do, only the driver he was overtaking deliberately narrowed the gap which was there as he started the manoeuvre.

I can't see that he has done anything wrong.

**

People do not like you overtaking them, its an ego thing. Even if they are perfectly content behind the cars infront they dont want anyone overtaking them.

 

The only way is to assume that all drivers are going to do this and accelerate towards the car in front after dropping a gear or two and then pull out so you spend the least amount of time on the other side of the road but it has to be quick and there has to be enough room infront at the time of starting the overtaking manouver. Just drifting out as you accelerate will be seen.

 

The current journey to work I have has many overtaking places but people don't know them. I get some annoying person trying to prevent me overtaking about one or twice a month.

 

Oh ye, and they would rather see you die than let you in. True. Overtaking is dangerious you always need to leave enough room before the next corner or on comming car if you have to break back in to where you came from.

 

Its also an aquired skill to be able to judge distances and aproaching speeds bt a rule of thum is to assume that you are traveling twive as fast as you are so the corner ahead is only half the distance it seems.

 

Sorry drifted off the subject.

 

Etc

Wednesday, 21 April 2021

Thursday, 15 April 2021

Let's Get Directly to the Point ... Mr Richard Washington is blackmailing me

Received: from 10.196.194.208
 by atlas213.aol.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with HTTPS; 
Mon, 12 Apr 2021 07:30:30 +0000
Return-Path: <Peters@sedefouler.com>
Received: from 125.235.227.142 (EHLO Peters.sedefouler.com)
 by 10.196.194.208 with SMTP; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 07:30:30 +0000
X-Originating-Ip: [125.235.227.142]
 

 
 
 Received-SPF: none (
domain of sedefouler.com does not 
designate permitted sender hosts)
 Authentication-Results: 
atlas213.aol.mail.bf1.yahoo.com;
 dkim=unknown;
 spf=none smtp.mailfrom=sedefouler.com;
 dmarc=unknown 
header.from=sedefouler.com;
 
Email from Mr Richard Washington

[The customary "Dear Mr Miller," is ommited presumably by accident so I insert it]

I know bollocks11 is one of your password on day of hack..


Lets get directly to the point.

Not one person has paid me to check about you.


You do not know me and you're probably thinking why you are getting this email?

in fact, i actually placed a malware on the adult vids (adult porn) website and you know what, you visited this site to experience fun (you know what i mean).

When you were viewing videos, your browser started out operating as a RDP having a key logger which provided me with accessibility to your display and web cam. 


immediately after that, my malware obtained every one of your contacts from your Messenger, FB, as well as email account.

after that i created a double-screen video. 1st part shows the video you were viewing (you have a nice taste omg), and 2nd part displays the recording of your cam, and its you.


Best solution would be to pay me $5853.

We are going to refer to it as a donation. in this situation, i most certainly will without delay remove your video.



My -BTC -address : 1L3rGZEupArSTbLcuVFqQ9QgG3v28KfQQn

[case SeNSiTiVe, copy & paste it]


You could go on your life like this never happened and you will not ever hear back again from me.


You'll make the payment via Bitcoin (if you do not know this, search 'how to buy bitcoin' in Google).
if you are planning on going to the law, surely, this e-mail can not be traced back to me, because it's hacked too.

I have taken care of my actions. i am not looking to ask you for a lot, i simply want to be paid.

if i do not receive the bitcoin; in 24hrs, i definitely will send out your video recording to all of your contacts including friends and family, co-workers, and so on.


Nevertheless, if i do get paid, i will destroy the recording immediately.
If you need proof, reply with Yeah then i will send out your video recording to your 19 contacts.

it's a nonnegotiable offer and thus please don't waste mine time & yours by replying to this message. 

 

____

Dear Mr Richard Washington,

I do not think it is a secret to the world that I am a wanker, therefore I can only advise you to - in the words of the Duke Of Wellington - "publish and be damned".

Unfortunately I do not have a webcam plugged permanantly into my computer (I only own desktops) so I think  your chances of humilitating me may be slim - particularly using an old password from the Neopets site which was hacked in 2020 see here.


While you're there could you perhaps feed my Neopet I feel I have been neglecting him for much of the past 10 years and he is probably very hungry

Thank you

Mr Miller


Pear Shaped Episode 14


 

Thank you for your inattention to this matter...

If anyone's still in doubt about the ramifications of the Andy Burnham situation let me spell it out for you.   There are 400 Labour MPs...

Least ignored nonsense this month...