We're supposed to learn someonething from these voyeuristic exercises in Judicial tittle tattle but I fear that all I left with was a view of m'learned friends as smug and pompous. Mind you it wasn't totally without entertainment value. Perhaps there's a new form of detective drama here. Instead of the Whodunnit? the Howdeliberatelydidtheydoit? for that seems to be the crux of the issue in most of these cases. Hardly anyone is a victim of a miscarriage of justice. More often than not a miscarriage of sentencing. Even when judgements are overturned it usually only results in a retrial rather than the wrongly convicted bursting from the courtroom to a blaze of camera flashes. Or at least that's what the narrator tells us..
One thing's for certian - all the Judges eat well. Not that there aren't probably thin Judges somewhere but these three near Dickensian caricatures look like they enjoy a port and a pie...
And what is my considered view of the value of this program...?
Avizandum
No comments:
Post a Comment